Comments from Members

- Keep up the good work.  Respect the action of those who gave up land under policy of eminent domain. . .

- Educate the children while they are young - encourage hikes, work days, etc.

- Stay focused on primary goal of protecting our park. 

- It is so important to keep access to the State Park affordable to local people.  This is not happening. Mount Sunapee for the affluent is in no one's interest.

- Keep the Mt. Sunapee buffer zone intact.  Discourage development that mars our mountain sides (and tops). Encourage zoning that makes best conservation use of land - leaving corridors open. 

- The low-intensity recreation (e.g. hiking) and ecological protection should take precedence over ski area development and management, at Mt. Sunapee State Park and elsewhere, and you provide effective advocacy f or that good.

- Get back N.H. Seniors’ rights to free skiing at Mt. Sunapee. We are the landlords not the tenants.

- Work to safeguard protected public lands from environmentally damaging uses, commercialization and privatization.

 

Lawsuit Dismissed. Okemo Appeals.

This past April, the Merrimack Superior Court dismissed the lawsuit filed by the operators of Okemo/Mount Sunapee Resort over its controversial proposal to expand the ski lease area. The case is now under appeal.

As FOMS reported in our March 2008 newsletter, threat of a lawsuit emerged publicly in 2005 after Governor John Lynch refused to bring forward and approve the Resort’s request for an additional 175 acres of parkland to facilitate cross-border expansion and private, condo development on adjoining land in Goshen.

In October 2007, the Resort filed its complaint against the State of New Hampshire in the Merrimack court that led to the dismissal.

In the decision, Judge Diane M. Nicolosi said the Resort had “no valid right to use the land outside the bound, and therefore no right has been taken. Without a valid property right, Sunapee (the Resort) cannot maintain a cause of action…”

In short, the operating lease and the contract to operate the ski area at Mount Sunapee State Park did not assure expansion as the Resort asserts

In June 2009, Okemo/MSR filed notice of appeal with the NH Superior Court and submitted a brief in August. The State’s response was due October 15th.

As many recall, strong opposition emerged over leasing the ski area at Mount Sunapee State Park. At public meetings and hearings leading up to the State’s decision in 1998, citizens expressed concern over the potential of real estate development and the use of public land for private gain.

In the dismissal, Judge Nicolosi acknowledged the controversy and found that the State attempted to lessen public opposition at the time by intentionally limiting the leasehold area to the existing ski area.

FOMS is monitoring the situation and will continue to provide updates on its website.

See Okemo Lawsuit for the decision and related documents and articles.

In 2005 Gov. John Lynch said, “…we must have a higher test for private use of our public lands, which are a treasure and a trust that belong to all of our citizens. As I have consistently said, my basic test for leasing state lands to a private business is that there must be compelling proof of a public benefit.”

 

Sign Up for email updates

Want regular updates from Friends of Mount Sunapee?

Join our email newsletters using the form below!

Email Address:

First Name:

Zip Code:

We hate spam and know you do, too. That's why we'll never sell or share your address.

You can unsubscribe anytime you want using the "Manage My Account" link in every email we'll send you.

Websites by Simplweb